Cytotoxic Agents

Today, two main categories of highly potent cytotoxic anticancer agents are used in antibody-drug conjugates: microtubule disrupting agents and DNA modifying agents. Microtubules play important roles in the cell cycle. If they malfunction cells are unable to divide. Most of the known microtubule disrupting agents are derived from natural product sources and are extremely cytotoxic. Unlike drugs that affect the microtubules and only work on cells in certain stages of the cell cycle, DNA modifying agents will kill cells at any point.

Several microtubule disrupting agents are being used and tested in clinical trials. Seattle Genetics, for example, has made numerous derivatives of dolastatin 10, which was originally isolated from the Indian Ocean sea hare Dolabella auricularia. Monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), with the generic name vedotin, was designed to be released from the antibody by cathepsin B enzymatic cleavage. A second derivative, Monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF), is attached via a non-cleavable linker, with a charged group to limit cell egress.

Immunogen has also made a family of microtubule-disrupting payloads. Their agent is  derived from the natural product maytansine, which is isolated from plants of the genus Maytenus. These derivatives have been engineered to incorporate thiol groups, which are used to conjugate the molecules to the linker. DM1 gives a non-hindered disulfide once coupled to the linker, making it readily cleavable in the reducing environment inside the cells. DM4 has a dimethyl substitution alpha to the disulfide linkage, making it a little less easy to reduce.

Because rapidly dividing cells, such as cancer cells, are much more susceptible to the toxic effects of drugs than normal cells that are dividing slowly, it can be beneficial to use DNA modifying agents to kill off the rapid dividers. DNA damage is the basis for many of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, but those that are used in the clinic have relatively low potency, because the therapeutic index drops as the potency increases.

Different types of DNA modifying agents
The DNA modifying agents also tend to be derived from natural products. Bristol-Myers Squibb and Medarex have developed various natural product-derived APIs which bind in the minor groove of DNA, positioning the toxin to alkylate the DNA via nucleophilic attack to cause mutagenesis. A family of synthetic toxins called duocarmycin analogs from The Netherlands based Synthon (formerly Syntarga) also binds this way. Although none of these are yet in the clinic, a good deal of work has been done to dial in different linker properties and activities.

The second group of DNA damaging agents that are being used in ADCs are DNA strand scission inducing agents. Pfizer (formerly Wyeth) uses derivatives of calicheamicin, an enediyne antibiotic originally isolated from the bacterium Micromonospora echinospora. Again, they bind to the minor groove of DNA. In this case, instead of alkylating the DNA, once attached they undergo a chemical reaction which generates a diradical species and in turn breaks one of the DNA strands.

Calicheamicin is the active agent in gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg; Pfizer), which was approved in 2000. However, confirmatory trials beginning in 2004 were stopped early when researchers did not observe a clinical benefit, and after a greater number of deaths were observed in the group of patients receiving gemtuzumab ozogamicin compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone. The results of a randomized study by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), one of the largest National Cancer Institute-supported cancer clinical trials cooperative groups, led to the voluntary withdrawal of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in 2010, when improved efficacy could not be demonstrated while toxicity appeared to be excessive

The same agent is used as the payload for Pfizer's second generation antibody-drug conjugate CMC-544 (inotuzumab ozogamicin), which is currently in clinical trials.

[1] Rowe JM, Löwenberg B. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukemia: a remarkable saga about an active drug.  Blood 2013, April 16 [Epub ahead of print]
[2] Petersdorf S, Kopecky K, Stuart RK,  Larson RA, Nevill TJ et al. Preliminary results of Southwest Oncology Group Study S0106: An international intergroup phase 3 randomized trial comparing the addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin to standard induction therapy versus standard induction therapy followed by a second randomization to post-consolidation gemtuzumab ozogamicin versus no additional therapy for previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia,” Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2009 114: Abstract 790 Oral and Poster Abstracts; Oral Session: Acute Myeloid Leukemia - Therapy, excluding Transplantation: Biologically Directed Therapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Monday, December 7, 2009: 6:45 PM. 291-292 (Ernest N. Morial Convention Center)

This pages was last updated on October 29, 2013

© 2014   Created by InPress Media Group, LLC.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service